Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 overall score. Motorola Moto G200 5G's body is much newer, but way thicker and noticeably heavier than Galaxy S6 edge+. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G200 5G has newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, giving you some additional features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a much better screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto G200 5G has a faster processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and they are faster).
The Moto G200 5G features a very superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Motorola Moto G200 5G has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a camera with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Moto G200 5G counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.