Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-11-18 | 2017-09-19 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is much better than Xperia XZ1, with a general score of 86.2 against 78.3. Moto G200 5G's design is a lot newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Xperia XZ1. The Xperia XZ1 features a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a much smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch.
Moto G200 5G has a bit better processor than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G features a much better camera than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in low-light situations.
The Sony Xperia XZ1 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ1, because it has an 85 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.