Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-11-18 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is slightly better than Sony Xperia XZ3, getting an 86.2 score against 79.6. These devices use Android OS, but the Moto G200 5G has 11 version and Sony Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Moto G200 5G's body is much newer and thinner than Sony Xperia XZ3's, but it is just a little bit heavier.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Xperia XZ3 has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a greater screen pixels density.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G takes better videos and photos than Sony Xperia XZ3, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture. The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.