Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-11-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Glacier Green and Stellar Blue | Black and White |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a score of 86.2, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Motorola Moto G200 5G's design is just a little bit lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's much thicker and was released 2 years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G200 5G has an older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because it has a bigger screen, a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Moto G200 5G, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.