Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-05-18 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, with a 90.5 score against 72.1. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a way newer and thinner device than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, although it's also much heavier. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little sharper display than Moto G4 Plus, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a larger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Galaxy A90 5G features a superior processor than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much higher video definition.
Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.