Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 127.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is much better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, getting a overall score of 79.3 against 72.1. Although the Galaxy S6 edge+ is older than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, it's construction is a little lighter and notably thinner. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a brighter display than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because it has a little bigger display, a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better display pixel density.
Motorola Moto G4 Plus features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola Moto G4 Plus also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 128 GB. Moto G4 Plus features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto G4 Plus also has more cores (although they are slower).
The Moto G4 Plus and the Galaxy S6 edge+ have extremely similar battery durations. Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a larger camera aperture and a much better video definition.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Moto G4 Plus. If you want to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.