Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.02 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 127.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.4 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus, getting a 77.8 score against 72.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is extremely newer and notably thinner than the Motorola Moto G4 Plus's, although it is also much heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a just a little higher screen pixel density, a way bigger display and a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480.
Motorola Moto G4 Plus has a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G4 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Moto G4 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Moto G4 Plus, because it has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos and a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G4 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto G4 Plus. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, else you can save some money and get the Moto G4 Plus, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.