Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-28 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is better than Moto G41's 79.1 general score. Despite of the fact the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is older and a bit heavier than Moto G41, it's construction is still a little thinner. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a screen that's just as good as Moto G41's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
Moto G41 counts with just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G41 also has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better processor than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM.
Motorola Moto G41 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better camera than Motorola Moto G41, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.