Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-28 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.28 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is better than the Motorola Moto G41, getting a score of 87.1 against 79.1. Galaxy Note9's body is incredibly older, somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Moto G41. Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit faster CPU than Moto G41, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G41, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display and a better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Moto G41 has slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Moto G41 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The Moto G41 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G41 also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Moto G41 counts with longer battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.