Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-03-31 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than Motorola Moto G5 Plus's general score of 74.6. LG V50 ThinQ's body is notably newer and thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120, a bigger screen and more pixels per display inch. LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back camera, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The LG V50 ThinQ features improved battery performance than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ costs a little more money than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.