Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-03-31 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is better than Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. The Galaxy A32 is a newer and just a little thinner cellphone than the Moto G5 Plus, but it's extremely heavier. Moto G5 Plus features a better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher screen pixels density and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Moto G5 Plus and the Galaxy A32 both have extremely similar processing units, they have the same RAM amount and 8 processing cores. Galaxy A32 counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot higher resolution camera.
Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery performance than Moto G5 Plus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.