Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is way better than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus's overall score of 74.6. Galaxy A71 5G is a newer and thinner device than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, although it's heavier. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G and Moto G5 Plus have extremely similar displays, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a little lower screen density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger screen. Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior camera than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Galaxy A71 5G has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is way more expensive than the Motorola Moto G5 Plus, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.