Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-03-31 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is a lot better than Moto G5 Plus's general score of 74.6. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's construction is way newer and somewhat thinner, but a lot heavier than the Moto G5 Plus. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a display that is very similar to Moto G5 Plus's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a just a bit inferior number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G features a much better camera than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto G5 Plus, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.