Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-03-31 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.91 x 2.91 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the Moto G5 Plus's global score of 74.6. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a a lot newer and incredibly thinner phone than the Moto G5 Plus, although it is also heavier. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Moto G5 Plus, because although it has a quite worse number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a lot larger screen.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Moto G5 Plus counts with a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Moto G5 Plus, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot better 50 megapixels resolution camera, a way larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Motorola Moto G5 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Moto G5 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto G5 Plus. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto G5 Plus, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.