Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.9 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.0 |
| 2017-03-11 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.68 x 2.87 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.13 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 140.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 8937 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.8 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a general score of 71.5, which is a little bit better than Moto G5's 66.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket's body is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G5. The Motorola Moto G5 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, and they both have 2 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Moto G5 also counts with a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a little sharper display than Moto G5, although it has a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720, a way worse screen density and a little bit smaller screen. The Moto G5 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Moto G5 also has a back facing camera with a way higher 13 MP resolution and a lot bigger aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy S III Cricket features a better storage for apps and games than Moto G5, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory. The Moto G5 counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 2800mAh battery size against 2100mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.