Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting a score of 84.2 against 77.8. Galaxy A7 (2018)'s design is somewhat lighter and thinner than Motorola Moto G51 5G, even though it was released 3 years before. The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2220 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the display.
Galaxy A7 (2018) features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more internal memory. Galaxy A7 (2018) has a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Motorola Moto G51 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also counts with better 240 frames per second video frame rate and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
The Moto G51 5G has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.