Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-12-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is much better than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, getting an 87.1 score against 77.8. The Galaxy Note9 is an noticeably older cellphone than the Motorola Moto G51 5G, but Samsung made it a little thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Galaxy Note9 has a little more vivid display than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy Note9 also has 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G51 5G counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality, the Moto G51 5G also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels and faster video frame rates. The Moto G51 5G has better battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.