Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than Moto G51 5G, with a overall score of 79.3 against 77.8. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has the older 5.1 version and Moto G51 5G has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ body is way lighter and a lot thinner than the Moto G51 5G, although it was released many years before.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than Moto G51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. Moto G51 5G has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Moto G51 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB.
Motorola Moto G51 5G features a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has a greater number of cores. Motorola Moto G51 5G has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G51 5G captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Motorola Moto G51 5G also has better 240 frames per second video frame rates, a much better 50 MP resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better photos and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.