Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-12-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 387 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G51 5G is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a global score of 77.8 against 77.8. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola Moto G51 5G has the older 11 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Motorola Moto G51 5G is a older and notably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Motorola was able to build it a little lighter anyway.
Moto G51 5G counts with a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Moto G51 5G, because it has a larger display, a much higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G51 5G, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better battery lifetime than Moto G51 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto G51 5G, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a bigger aperture for better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.