Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2022-12-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue Lavender, Matter Charcoal and Rose Gold | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480+ SM4350-AC (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is much better than the Motorola Moto G53, getting an 81.6 score against 72. Google Pixel 2's construction is just a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than the Motorola Moto G53, even though it was released many years before. Google Pixel 2 features a way better performance than Motorola Moto G53. They have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Google Pixel 2 features a more vivid screen than Moto G53, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much better amount of pixels per inch of screen. The Google Pixel 2 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G53, although it has a way less mega-pixels camera, they both have a same size diafragm aperture.
Moto G53 has a much better storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G53 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Moto G53 has a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.