Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is much better than the Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 score. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer and thinner than Moto G5S Plus's, but it's also just a bit heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more powerful processor than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a greater pixels density, a larger display and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better camera than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light environments.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more memory for applications and games than Moto G5S Plus, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with superior battery performance than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more money than the Moto G5S Plus, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.