Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-08-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than the Moto G5S Plus's 74.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is extremely newer and a little thinner than Moto G5S Plus's, although it is heavier. Moto G5S Plus has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution and a higher pixels density.
Galaxy A32 has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. Moto G5S Plus and Samsung Galaxy A32 have incredibly similar processing units, they have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A32 shoots much better videos and photos than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a back facing camera with much more megapixels. The Galaxy A32 features a much better battery life than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.