Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 144.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Moto G5S Plus, having a 91.8 score against 74.8. Although the Galaxy A71 5G is a little heavier than the Moto G5S Plus, it's thinner and noticeably newer. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit faster processor than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit more vivid display than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than Moto G5S Plus, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.