Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-08-01 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than the Moto G5S Plus, with a 90.5 score against 74.8. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G body is notably newer and thinner, but heavier than Moto G5S Plus. Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better looking display than Moto G5S Plus, because although it has a just a bit worse count of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a little bit better hardware performance than Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Galaxy A90 5G captures way better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and although they both have the same aperture, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.