Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-08-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.04 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and White | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 144.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than the Moto G5S Plus, getting a 77.8 score against 74.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way newer and much thinner phone than the Moto G5S Plus, but it's also a lot heavier. Moto G5S Plus has a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because it has a much bigger display, a much higher 2200 x 2480px resolution and a bit higher pixels amount in each inch of display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a 90% larger battery size. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Moto G5S Plus, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture, a lot better resolution back-facing camera and a much higher video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Moto G5S Plus, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G5S Plus. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Motorola Moto G5S Plus, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.