Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-04-19 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than Motorola Moto G6's 72.1 score. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is a lot newer than the Motorola Moto G6's, but it's heavier and a bit thicker. The Galaxy A32 features a little better performance than Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A32 also has more RAM.
The Moto G6 has a much better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a way better display density. The Galaxy A32 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a much better battery duration than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 67% more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A32 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Moto G6, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same (4K) video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a way better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.