Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-04-19 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is much better than Moto G6, getting a overall score of 82.3 against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy A60's design is newer and just a bit thinner than the Moto G6's, although it is also just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A60 features a display that is just as good as the Moto G6 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a bit inferior pixels count per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A60 features just a bit better processing power than Moto G6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy A60 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a superior memory to install games and applications than Moto G6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Galaxy A60 has just a bit better battery duration than Moto G6, because it has a 13% larger battery size. Galaxy A60 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G6, because although it has a smaller sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A60 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a bigger camera aperture to take better photography in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.