Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than the Moto G6's 72.1 general score. Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a bit heavier than the Moto G6, it's just a little thinner and also newer. The Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a display that is just as good as the display in Moto G6, because although the Galaxy A71 5G has a quite lower display density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a lot better camera than Moto G6, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, a same size aperture and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a lot higher 64 MP resolution back-facing camera and a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Moto G6, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G features a way better battery duration than Moto G6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than Moto G6, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.