Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-04-19 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is better than Moto G6, having an 81 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is thinner than Moto G6, but it is somewhat heavier and was released about 14 months before. The Moto G6 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2160 pixels resolution and a bit higher screen density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a SD card slot that admits up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Moto G6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G6 takes clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video and a much better (4K) video definition. The Galaxy C9 Pro has better battery life than Moto G6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.