Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 197.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the Moto G6, with a 79.3 score against 72.1. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an incredibly older phone than the Moto G6, but Samsung managed to make it a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G6, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a little bit higher pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Moto G6 features just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB. The Moto G6 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S6 edge+'s battery lifetime is just as good as the Motorola Moto G6 one. Galaxy S6 edge+ shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G6, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G6. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G6, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.