Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-04-19 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.06 x 2.85 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gray and Pink | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 197.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G6, having a 77.8 score against 72.1. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a extremely newer and way thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G6, although it is notably heavier. The Motorola Moto G6 has a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Moto G6, because although it has a quite worse count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a much bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G6, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger camera aperture, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery duration than Motorola Moto G6, because it has a 90 percent more battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto G6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G6. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G6, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.