Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than the Moto G60, getting an 81.6 score against 79.5. Google Pixel 2's construction is much lighter and extremely thinner than the Moto G60, even though it was released 4 years before. Google Pixel 2 features a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
The Google Pixel 2 and Moto G60 have similar processors, both of them have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Moto G60 counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Motorola Moto G60 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 122% greater battery capacity. The Moto G60 has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.