Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-04-27 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is better than the Motorola Moto G60's global score of 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is an older device than the Motorola Moto G60, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and thinner. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both should give you the same OS features.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better looking display than Moto G60, although it has a little bit worse display density, a little bit smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has an external SD slot that admits 24 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit superior processor than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Motorola Moto G60 has better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 33% more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than Moto G60, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 64 megapixels resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.