Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-27 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 618 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Moto G60's 79.5 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is an much older phone than Moto G60, but it is lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Galaxy Note9 features just a little better processing power than Moto G60, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G60, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a better amount of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Note9 has just a bit more memory to install games and applications than Moto G60, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Moto G60 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a way smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G60 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Moto G60 has a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.