Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a little bit better than Moto G60s, getting a general score of 81.6 against 79.9. The Google Pixel 2 body is somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter than Moto G60s. The Google Pixel 2 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count per inch of display.
The Google Pixel 2 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G60s. Both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Moto G60s has a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Moto G60s shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Moto G60s also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.