Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 395 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Moto G60s's 79.9 score. Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, and Moto G60s comes with Android 11 OS. Galaxy A32 is a just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner phone than the Moto G60s. Motorola Moto G60s features a better looking display than Galaxy A32, because it has a much better 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little bit larger display and a greater screen pixel density.
Galaxy A32's CPU is just as good as Moto G60s's processing unit, both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cores. Motorola Moto G60s counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low light environments.
The Moto G60s counts with a greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB, the Moto G60s also has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32's battery life is very similar to Moto G60s's battery life.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.