Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola Moto G60s, with a general score of 84.2 against 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) body is much thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola Moto G60s. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features just a bit better screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixels amount in each screen inch.
The Moto G60s counts with a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G60s counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 52 percent greater battery size. The Motorola Moto G60s has a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.