Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Moto G60s, with a 91.8 score against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Moto G60s. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better CPU than Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G has a little more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G60s, although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch of screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy A71 5G captures a little bit better photos and videos than Moto G60s, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures and videos, they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video resolution and a same resolution camera. The Moto G60s has a little bit more memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Moto G60s also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
Moto G60s has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.