Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Iced Mint and Ink Blue | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is slightly better than the Moto G60s's 79.9 overall score. The Galaxy Note9 design is just a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Moto G60s. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto G60s counts with a little bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G60s also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note9 features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note9 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G60s features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low-light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G60s also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Moto G60s features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.