Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is just a bit better than the Moto G7 Plus, getting a overall score of 81.6 against 76.1. Even though Google Pixel 2 is older than the Moto G7 Plus, it's design is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Google Pixel 2 has a little better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 CPU cores.
Google Pixel 2 has just a bit better screen than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 1920px, it also counts with a little bit greater number of pixels in each inch in the display. The Moto G7 Plus has a bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G7 Plus features a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same camera sensor size, the Moto G7 Plus also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a way more megapixels camera.
Moto G7 Plus has a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.