Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has a score of 91.8, which is much better than Moto G7 Plus's score of 76.1. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and Moto G7 Plus has Android 10. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is newer and a little thinner than the Moto G7 Plus's, but it is also a little bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit sharper display than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a bit worse pixels quantity in each inch of screen, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A71 5G has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy A71 5G also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A71 5G features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has more internal storage and an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a lot better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better battery duration than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.