Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 2270 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Moto G7 Plus, getting a 77.8 score against 76.1. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a more recent 14 version while Moto G7 Plus has Android 10 version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much newer and way thinner device than Moto G7 Plus, although it is somewhat heavier.
The Moto G7 Plus counts with a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a bit higher screen pixel density, a larger display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 90 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.