Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 279 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is better than Moto G7 Power's 72.6 global score. The iPhone 8 construction is way lighter and thinner than the Moto G7 Power, although it was released just 17 months before. Apple iPhone 8 has a much better looking display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit worse 750 x 1334 resolution, it also counts with a little greater display density.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The iPhone 8 counts with a better processing power than Moto G7 Power, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
IPhone 8 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have a back camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the iPhone 8 also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a larger aperture.
Moto G7 Power counts with a superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto G7 Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto G7 Power, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.