Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is much better than the Moto G7 Power's 72.6 score. The iPhone XS Max body is somewhat thinner but a little bit heavier than Moto G7 Power, and both of them were released with only a couple months difference. IPhone XS Max features a superior performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit.
The iPhone XS Max has a much more vibrant display than Moto G7 Power, because it has a little bit larger screen, a much better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a lot higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The Moto G7 Power has a way bigger storage for apps and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G7 Power features a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh. The iPhone XS Max captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a 12 megapixels resolution camera, the iPhone XS Max also has a larger sensor, a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Motorola Moto G7 Power, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.