Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is much better than Moto G7 Power, having an 80.3 score against 72.6. Google Nexus 6P is an notably older phone than the Moto G7 Power, but it's extremely thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Moto G7 Power. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
The Google Nexus 6P has a much better display than Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a lot higher display density. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little bit more memory for applications and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Moto G7 Power has a much longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video definition, a F2 diafragm aperture and the same video frame rate, the Google Nexus 6P also has a camera with a better resolution and a much larger sensor.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto G7 Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola Moto G7 Power, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.