Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is much better than the Moto G7 Power's 72.6 general score. The Google Pixel 2 design is way lighter and thinner than the Moto G7 Power, although it was released only 16 months before. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little better hardware performance than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and a way better screen pixel density. Google Pixel 2 takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Google Pixel 2 also has a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Moto G7 Power has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent greater battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.