Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-02-07 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is much better than Moto G7 Power, getting a score of 81.3 against 72.6. Google Pixel XL is an noticeably older device than Moto G7 Power, but it's somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. Google Pixel XL's processing unit is just as good as the Moto G7 Power one, because although the Google Pixel XL has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel XL features a much better looking display than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher count of pixels per screen inch and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Google Pixel XL takes a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Google Pixel XL also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with more mega pixels.
Google Pixel XL counts with just a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G7 Power has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Moto G7 Power. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola Moto G7 Power, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.