Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 279 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than Moto G7 Power's general score of 72.6. Although LG V50 ThinQ and Moto G7 Power were released with only 3 months difference, LG V50 ThinQ is a little lighter and somewhat thinner. These devices work with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better performance than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a lot higher pixels quantity per inch in the display and a quite larger screen.
LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Power, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. LG V50 ThinQ captures clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG V50 ThinQ also has higher video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a way bigger aperture.
The Moto G7 Power features better battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.