Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-02-07 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 279 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, getting an 84.7 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with Android OS, while Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie OS. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is newer and a little bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Motorola Moto G7 Power.
The Motorola Moto G7 Power counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 720 x 1570px resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Galaxy A32 features a little better processing power than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A32 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G7 Power, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal storage. Galaxy A32 has a battery duration that's just as good as Moto G7 Power's battery duration.
The Galaxy A32 has a superior camera than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.