Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-07 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.98 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1570 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 279 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Moto G7 Power, with a 91.8 score against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is newer, thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola Moto G7 Power. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto G7 Power has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy A71 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Moto G7 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A71 5G features a brighter screen than Moto G7 Power, because it has a little larger display, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a better pixel number in each inch of display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a lot better camera than Moto G7 Power, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations, a much bigger sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater memory for apps and games than Moto G7 Power, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G7 Power has a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more money than Motorola Moto G7 Power, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.